Should
interest rates be capped in Kenya? The answer is simple. It depends on who you
ask since there are different stakeholders in this debate. If you ask
borrowers, most would genuinely answer yes. Recently, one borrower stated to me,
“Something needs to be done. We borrowers should unite and call for cheaper
interest.”
Within
the Kenyan government, politicians have differing opinions as well. Such views
are becoming public with the recent debates and defeat of the proposed amendments
to the Finance Bill that would have capped commercial lending rates at four
percent above the Central Bank Rate.
Even
though lending opportunities continue to expand in Kenya with the start of new
commercial banks, microfinance institutions and Sacco societies, the
competition has yet to provide benefit to consumers through lower rates. Specifically,
within microfinance, an industry that continues to blossom, the push for
profitability and sustainability as the metrics for success has not benefited
consumers as interest rates continue to increase. This has created a lending culture
of putting profit before the client.
When
I first started researching microfinance lending in Kenya two years ago, interest
rates were as high as 14% per annum, but now the rates range from 23%-30% per
annum for these low income financial consumers. As a researcher of
microfinance, many consumers continue to ask me: How high can interest rates
continue to climb?
The
reality is that all financial institutions operate in the interest of profit,
not the welfare of consumers. This may be a simplistic view of lenders, but it
is the reality of consumers.
Currently,
as I prepare to launch a new consumer education manual to help expand the financial
literacy of microfinance borrowers, I myself realize that this initiative will
not be successful without increased regulation over the financial industry.
There needs to be a transformation of the current
institutions of advocacy and consumer protection in Kenya at the policy level
through an increase in legislation and regulation of the financial industry to
compliment the efforts of Kenyan civil society organizations and consumers.
Perhaps capping interest rates would have been the first step towards achieving these important parameters necessary in any financial market? After all, markets are not perfect.
Even
though economists in Kenyan and around the world are against the freezing of
interest rates in any market, I
find it curious how rumors and accusations are surfacing again that members of parliament benefited (or potentially benefited)
once
again from the lack of concrete action toward financial regulation that would increase consumer protection in Kenya.
While
many members of parliament claim that capping rates would be devastating to the
economy, there is no excuse why other measures to increase consumer protection, including
creating a consumer protection bureau, amending the acts that regulate the
different players of the
Kenyan financial market and passing the Consumer Protection Bill, have failed
as well.